Every
two years, Moz
surveys the brightest minds in SEO and search marketing with a
comprehensive set of questions meant to gauge the current workings of Google's
search algorithm. This year's panel of experts possesses a truly unique set of
knowledge and perspectives. We're thankful on behalf of the entire community
for their contribution.
In
addition to asking the participants about what does and doesn't work in
Google's ranking algorithm today, one of the most illuminating group of
questions asks the panel to predict the future of search – how the features of
Google's algorithm are expected to change over the next 12 months.
Amazingly,
almost all of the factors that are expected to increase in influence revolved
around user experience, including:
Mobile-friendliness
Perceived
value
Readability
...and
more
The
experts predicted that more traditional ranking signals, such as those around
links and URL structures, would largely remain the same, while the more
manipulative aspects of SEO, like paid links and anchor text (which is subject
to manipulation), would largely decrease in influence.
The
survey also asks respondents to weight the importance of various factors within
Google's current ranking algorithm (on a scale of 1-10). Understanding these
areas of importance helps to inform webmasters and marketers where to invest
time and energy in working to improve the search presence of their websites.
On-page keyword
features
These
features describe use of the keyword term/phrase in particular parts of the HTML
code on the page (title element, H1s, alt attributes, etc).
-
Highest influence: Keyword present in title element, 8.34
-
Lowest influence: Keyword present in specific HTML elements
(bold/italic/li/a/etc), 4.16
Titles
are still very powerful. Overall, it's about focus and matching query syntax.
If your post is about airplane propellers but you go on a three paragraph rant
about gorillas, you're going to have a problem ranking for airplane propellers.
-
AJ Kohn
Keyword
usage is vital to making the cut, but we don't always see it correlate with
ranking, because we're only looking at what already made the cut. The page has
to be relevant to appear for a query, IMO, but when it comes to how high the
page ranks once it's relevant, I think keywords have less impact than they once
did. So, it's a necessary but not sufficient condition to ranking.
-
Peter Meyers
In
my experience, most of problems with organic visibility are related to on-page
factors. When I look for an opportunity, I try to check for 2 strong things:
presence of keyword in the title and in the main content. Having both can speed
up your visibility, especially on long-tail queries.
-
Fabio Ricotta
Domain-level
keyword features
These
features cover how keywords are used in the root or subdomain name, and how
much impact this might have on search engine rankings.
-
Highest influence: Keyword is the exact match root domain name, 5.83
-
Lowest influence: Keyword is the domain extension, 2.55
The
only domain/keyword factor I've seen really influence rankings is an exact
match. Subdomains, partial match, and others appear to have little or no effect.
-
Ian Lurie
There's
no direct influence, but an exact match root domain name can definitely lead to
a higher CTR within the SERPs and therefore a better ranking in the long term.
-
Marcus Tandler
It's
very easy to link keyword-rich domains with their success in Google's results
for the given keyword. I'm always mindful about other signals that align with
domain name which may have contributed to its success. These includes inbound
links, mentions, and local citations.
-
Dan Petrovic
Page-level
link-based features
These
features describe link metrics for the individual ranking page (such as number
of links, PageRank, etc).
-
Highest influence: Raw quantity of links from high-authority sites, 7.78
-
Lowest influence: Sentiment of the external links pointing to the page, 3.85
High-quality
links still rule rankings. The way a brand can earn links has become more
important over the years, whereas link schemes can hurt a site more than ever
before. There is a lot of FUD slinging in this respect!
-
Dennis Goedegebuure
Similar
to my thoughts on content, I suspect link-based metrics are going to be used
increasingly with a focus on verisimilitude (whether content is actually true
or not) and relationships between nodes in Knowledge Graph. Google's recent
issues with things, such as the snippet results for "evolution,"
highlight the importance of them only pulling things that are factually correct
for featured parts of a SERP. Thus, just counting traditional link metrics
won't cut it anymore.
-
Pete Wailes
While
anchor text is still a powerful ranking factor, using targeted anchor text
carries a significant amount of risk and can easily wipe out your previous
success.
-
Geoff Kenyon
Domain-level
brand features
These
features describe elements that indicate qualities of branding and brand
metrics.
-
Highest influence: Search volume for the brand/domain, 6.54
-
Lowest influence: Popularity of business's official social media profiles, 3.99
This
is clearly on deck to change very soon with the reintegration of Twitter into Google's
Real-Time Results. It will be interesting to see how this affects the
"Breaking News" box and trending topics. Social influencers, quality
and quantity of followers, RTs, and favorites will all be a factor. And what's
this?! Hashtags will be important again?! Have mercy!
-
Marshall Simmonds
Google
has to give the people what they want, and if most of the time they are
searching for a brand, Google is going to give them that brand. Google doesn't
have a brand bias, we do.
-
Russ Jones
It's
already noticeable; brands are more prominently displayed in search results for
both informational and commercial queries. I'm expecting Google will be paying
more attention to brand-related metrics from now on (and certainly more
initiatives to encourage site owners to optimize for better entity detection).
-
Jason Acidre
Page-level
social features
These
features relate to third-party metrics from social media sources (Facebook,
Twitter, Google+, etc) for the ranking page.
-
Highest influence: Engagement with content/URL on social networks, 3.87
-
Lowest influence: Upvotes for the page on social sites, 2.7
Social
ranking factors are important in a revamped Query Deserves Freshness algorithm.
Essentially, if your content gets a lot of natural tweets, shares, and likes,
it will rank prominently for a short period of time, until larger and more
authoritative sites catch up.
-
Dev Basu
Social
popularity has several factors to consider: (1) Years ago, Google and Bing said
they take into account the authority of a social profile sharing a link and the
popularity of the link being shared (retweets/reshares), and there was more
complexity to social signals that was never revealed even back then. (2) My
experience has been that social links and shares have more power for
newsy/fresh-type content. For example, a lot of social shares for a dentist's
office website wouldn't be nearly as powerful (or relevant to consider) as a
lot of social shares for an article on a site with a constant flow of fresh
content.
-
Laura Lippay
Honestly,
I do not think that the so-called "social signals" have any direct
influence on the Google Algorithm (that does not mean that a correlation
doesn't exist, though). My only doubt is related to Twitter, because of the
renewed contract between Google and Twitter itself. That said, as of now I do
not consider Twitter to offer any ranking signals, except for very specific
niches related to news and "news-able" content, where QDF plays a
fundamental role.
-
Gianluca Fiorelli
Page-level
keyword-agnostic features
These
elements describe non-keyword-usage, non-link-metrics features of individual
pages (such as length of the page, load speed, etc).
-
Highest influence: Uniqueness of the content on the page, 7.85
-
Lowest influence: Page contains Open Graph data and/or Twitter cards, 3.64
By
branching mobile search off of Google's core ranking algorithm, having a
"mobile-friendly" website is probably now less important for desktop
search rankings. Our clients are seeing an ever-increasing percentage of
organic search traffic coming from mobile devices, though (particularly in
retail), so this is certainly not an excuse to ignore responsive design – the
opposite, in fact. Click-through rate from the SERPs has been an important
ranking signal for a long time and continues to be, flagging irrelevant or
poor-quality search listings.
-
Rob Kerry
I
believe many of these will be measured within the ecosystem, rather than
absolutely. For example, the effect of bounce rate (or rather, bounce speed) on
a site will be relative to the bounce speeds on other pages in similar
positions for similar terms.
-
Dan Barker
I
want to answer these a certain way because, while I have been told by Google
what matters to them, what I see in the SERPs does not back up what Google
claims they want. There are a lot of sites out there with horrible UX that rank
in the top three. While I believe it's really important for conversion and to
bring customers back, I don't feel as though Google is all that concerned,
based on the sites that rank highly. Additionally, Google practically screams
"unique content," yet sites that more or less steal and republish content
from other sites are still ranking highly. What I think should matter to Google
doesn't seem to matter to them, based on the results they give me.
-
Melissa Fach
Domain-level
link authority features
These
features describe link metrics about the domain hosting the page.
-
Highest influence: Quantity of unique linking domains to the domain, 7.45
-
Lowest influence: Sentiment of the external links pointing to the site, 3.91
Quantity
and quality of unique linking domains at the domain level is still among the
most significant factors in determining how a domain will perform as a whole in
the organic search results, and is among the best SEO "spot checks"
for determining if a site will be successful relative to other competitor sites
with similar content and selling points.
-
Todd Malicoat
Throughout
this survey, when I say "no direct influence," this is
interchangeable with "no direct positive influence." For example,
I've marked exact match domain as low numbers, while their actual influence may
be higher – though negatively.
-
Kirsty Hulse
Topical
relevancy has, in my opinion, gained much ground as a relevant ranking factor.
Although I find it most at play when at page level, I am seeing significant
shifts at overall domain relevancy, by long-tail growth or by
topically-relevant domains linking to sites. One way I judge such movements is
the growth of the long-tail relevant to the subject or ranking, when neither
anchor text (exact match or synonyms) nor exact phrase is used in a site's
content, yet it still ranks very highly for long-tail and mid-tail synonyms.
-
Rishi Lakhani
Domain-level
keyword-agnostic features
These
features relate to the entire root domain, but don't directly describe link- or
keyword-based elements. Instead, they relate to things like the length of the
domain name in characters.
-
Highest influence: Uniqueness of content across the whole site, 7.52
-
Lowest influence: Length of time until domain name expires, 2.45
Character
length of domain name is another correlative yet not causative factor, in my
opinion. They don't need to rule these out – it just so happens that longer
domain names get clicked on, so they get ruled out quickly.
-
Ross Hudgens
A
few points: Google's document inception date patents describe how Google might
handle freshness and maturity of content for a query. The "trust
signal" pages sound like a site quality metric that Google might use to
score a page on the basis of site quality. Some white papers from Microsoft on
web spam signals identified multiple hyphens in subdomains as evidence of web
spam. The length of time until the domain expires was cited as a potential
signal in Google's patent on information retrieval through historic data, and
was refuted by Matt Cutts after domain sellers started trying to use that
information to sell domain extensions to "help the SEO" of a site.
-
Bill Slawski
I
think that page speed only becomes a factor when it is significantly slow. I
think that having error pages on the site doesn't matter, unless there are so
many that it greatly impacts Google's ability to crawl.
-
Marie Haynes
The future of
search
To
bring it back to the beginning, we asked the experts if they had any comments
or alternative signals they think will become more or less important over the
next 12 months.
While
I expect that static factors, such as incoming links and anchor text, will
remain influential, I think the power of these will be mediated by the presence
or absence of engagement factors.
-
Sha Menz
The
app world and webpage world are getting lumped together. If you have the more
popular app relative to your competitors, expect Google to notice.
-
Simon Abramovitch
Mobile
will continue to increase, with directly-related factors increasing as well.
Structured data will increase, along with more data partners and user
segmentation/personalization of SERPs to match query intent, localization, and
device-specific need states.
-
Rhea Drysdale
User
location may have more influence in mobile SERPs as (a) more connected devices
like cars and watches allow voice search, and (b) sites evolve accordingly to
make such signals more accurate.
-
Aidan Beanland
I
really think that over the next 12-18 months we are going to see a larger
impact of structured data in the SERPs. In fact, we are already seeing this.
Google has teams that focus on artificial intelligence and machine learning.
They are studying "relationships of interest" and, at the heart of
what they are doing, are still looking to provide the most relevant result in
the quickest fashion. Things like schema that help "educate" the
search engines as to a given topic or entity are only going to become more
important as a result.
-
Jody Nimetz
For
more data, check out the complete Ranking Factors Survey results.
Finally,
we leave you with this infographic created by Kevin Engle which shows the relative
weighting of broad areas of Google's algorithm, according to the experts.
0 comments:
Post a Comment